E.A. Poe Pioneering Detective Fiction
Edgar Allan Poe is often credited with being the first author to have developed the method of writing defective fiction that set the stone rolling for subsequent authors of this genre who borrowed heavily from Poes work. Tony Hillerman and Rosemary Herbert in their book - The Oxford Book of American Detective Stories, have accorded Edgar A. Poe, the status of Father of Detective Fiction.
In order to understand the emergence of this genre of literary writing, a brief overview of the events that led to the birth of detective fiction must be delved into. With the establishment of police and law enforcement forces around the world, the experiences of police officers working on criminal investigation cases began to be written about. Although the word detective had not yet come into common parlance, the memoirs of police officers surfaced quite often. The most famous among these were the memoirs of the head of the first French Police Force (the Surete), Eugene Frances Vidocq. Published in a series of four volumes during 1828-1829, they were immensely successful and despite the fact that the works supposedly based on Vidocqs personal experiences as a police officer, they were to a large extent fictitious. Also, although the volume was published under the name of Vidocq, it was in fact ghostwritten. Following these publications, works on detective fiction formally began which led to what is popularly known as the golden age of detective fiction.
By that time, Edgar Allan Poe had already published his main works of detective fiction and set the trend for a generation of authors who followed in Poes footsteps to contribute extensively to the literary genre. This was the time when Agatha Christies published her famous works epitomized in her characters Miss Marple and Hercule Poirot. A wide range of works were published during this time including the works of Nicholas Blake, John Dickson, Ngaio Marsh and Margery Allingham. In all these works, the style created by Poe was followed in varying degrees. The now celebrated ingredients of a detective fiction story which includes an enigmatic and brilliant detective, a more or less always-at-a-loss police force and the occurrence of an astounding crime. The detective was most often accompanied by a friend who also chronicled his friends work. The police force who appear almost contemptuous of the detective initially, are ultimately forced to acknowledge the superior intelligence of the detective as he succeeds in unraveling the mystery. The authors of the golden age of detective fiction used a variety of backdrops for their works. Thus while the traditional English settings saw their characters amidst country houses, cruise ships, trains and the quiet English villages, some other authors, such as Ngaio Marsh took examples from their daily lives to create the backdrops for their works. Marsh, who was a theatre producer, often used theater as the setting for his detective mysteries. Another instance is that of Freeman Wills Crofts who, being a railway engineer himself, used it as a backdrop for his writings. The golden age of detective fiction thus continued for the years to come along the formulaic lines set forth by Poe.
As is the nature of human progress, or rather every act of human progress, there always appears a counter to every ser standard and this happened with the genre of detective fiction as well. The form of writing that had come to be accepted and practiced by authors ranging from Agatha Christie to Arthur Conan Doyle was found reversed in the American style of writing the emerged soon after. The American style of writing has been referred to as the Hard Boiled School and it presented a wide contrast with the traditional form of writing detective fiction. While on the one hand the English authors claimed their ingenuity through their incredible mysteries which had to be unfurled through brilliant and meticulous modes of deduction, the American authors focused more on the glamour and sleaze of city life and violence and underhandedness that goes with crimes committed by physical strength rather than the power of the little grey cells. Quite naturally enough therefore, the readers of these two distinct schools of writing were also divergent. The most important point of distinction between the two forms of authorship was that whereas the American style used first person narrative, that is the detective himself was the narrator, the English school did not. The suspense that was kept up through till the end of the story in the traditional detective fictions was therefore lost in the Hard Boiled School because the readers were let in on the conclusions of the detective all along in the story. Hence, the theoretical progression and analytic deductions that were characteristic of traditional detective fiction were absent from the writings of the Hard Boiled School. Two best known examples of the Hard Boiled School fiction are the Black Mask magazine and the Yellowbacks. Both were quite successful among their respective readership. The yellowbacks, so called because of the distinctive yellow covers of the books followed the trend set by the Hard Boiled School and while they lacked in imaginative and analytic content, they did gain some commercial success. The publications were dependent on little more than hack journalism and were published cheaply. Recollections of a Detective Police Officer, written in 1856 by Waters was probably the most important among the yellowbacks. Till today, both schools of writing detective fiction persist with the yellowback types providing for quick reads while the traditional detective fictions stimulate the mind and provide an intriguing read.
During the next few decades after the golden age of detective fiction however, an attempt was made to revive the traditional form of detective fiction writing. This attempt was first made by Wilkie Collins in his work - The Woman in White which remains popular to this day. It was followed by another Wilkie Collins work titled The Moonstone in 1868. Detective fiction continued its journey through the works of Victor Hugo and Charles Dickens in Les Miserables and The Mystery of Edwin Drood respectively. At the same time the pulp fiction supplied by the Hard Boiled School also continued to find its own audience with the most famous title being The Mystery of Hansom Cab by Fergus Hume. Publications of the two forms of mystery stories continued in more or less the same way.
He is best understood in contrast but not in conflict with his environment. His great achievement needs no reflected glory from the mirror of an America depicted as a barren waste of spiritual vacancy. (Quinn, 1998)
Monsieur August C. Dupin, the character created by Poe is regarded as the first in the line of detectives of fiction. Dupin was first introduced to readers in 1841 in the short story - The Murders in the Rue Morgue (1841). Dupin also appeared in the subsequent works of detective fiction by Poe such as The Mystery of Marie Roget (1842 ) and The Purloined Letter (1844).
The character of Dupin with his meticulous attention to detail and ability to think out of the box and beyond what the officers of the police force could, is probably based on the story The Man of the Crowd by Poe. In The Man of the Crowd, Poe examines the dichotomy in the disposition of a person through the portrayal of two characters. The Man of the Crowd begins with an anonymous narrator who after having suffered an illness sits in a London caf watching the people pass by. As the narrator observes the various people bustling about in the street outside the caf, he tries to form an opinion about each of the persons by reading the expression on their faces, by their habit and so on. While doing so, the narrators attention is caught by one particular man who has an almost idiosyncratic expression on his face and is wearing tattered clothes but made of some fine textile. The narrator finds himself intrigued by this stranger and his inscrutable expression which he is unable to decipher. Taken up by this stranger whom the narrator cannot describe like the others on the street, he decides to follow the man and thus begins a long chase through the narrow streets and bazaars of a poorer section of London back into the heart of the metropolis. Contradiction was one of Poes favorite subjects. He writes humorously
If you wish to forget anything on the spot, make a note that this thing is to be remembered.
Poe, with subtle dexterity, hints at the fact that the man he was following may represent another hidden side of the narrators character himself. At the end of the story, the narrator comes to the conclusion that the stranger with the idiosyncratic expression could have the capability to perform some of the most exquisite crimes. The fact that the stranger represents a concealed part of the narrators character himself, points to the existence of contrasting attributes present in every person, with the predominance of one of the attributes determining the overall character of a person. By leaving the interpretation of the man being followed open to his readers, Poe also portrays the fact that the same thing can be interpreted differently by different people.
These two lines of thought eventually found their expression in the traditional detective fiction requisites, in that the detectives (for example, Dupin, Poirot and even Holmes) often tried to examine the scene of the crime and the crime itself from the perspective of the criminal. Getting inside the mind of the perpetrator of the crime was a tactic used by the detectives to ascertain who the criminal was and also the motive for the criminal act. Secondly, that a similar occurrence could be interpreted in divergent ways is also portrayed by Poe and other authors of detective fiction by showing how the detectives view the scene of the crime and how the police view the same. While the police often take things at face value and characteristically refuse to dig deeper and overlook vital clues and information relating to the offense, the detectives do the exact opposite and are thus instrumental in solving the case to the utter bafflement of the police officers.
The Murders in the Rue Morgue, first introduce Monsieur August Dupin and through him, the readers are invited to take part in the analysis of the crime, a style that was unique to the traditional school of detective fiction. The Murders in the Rue Morgue also for the first time, chooses the locked room as its backdrop, therefore making the story all the more mysterious. The story, which is narrated by Dupins friend, begins by the narrators amazement with his friends powers of deduction and analysis. He is enthralled by Dupins reflective capabilities and his sharp powers of observation which surpass that of most men in their ingenuity. What often eludes other men, is never lost on Dupin and this capability of being the objective observer to problems is what separates Dupin from the standardized thought processes that the police forces are slaves to.
The Murders in the Rue Morgue begin with newspaper articles about the murders of Madame L Espanaye and her daughter Camille. Both women are killed in a brutal manner that is concluded by Dupin as not being possible by a human being. While the narrator and Dupin follow the newspaper updates carefully, the arrest of Adolphe le Bon, a banker whom Dupin knew, inspires him to personally look into the case. The facts of the case which are constructed based on the accounts of the neighbors of the two women, baffle the police and the murders having been committed in a room that was locked from the inside serves to further mystify them. The neighbours inform that they heard two distinct voices, a deep masculine one and an unidentifiable one. While the daughters body is found stuffed inside the chimney, the mothers body is found beaten and mangled with incredible ferocity with her throat slashed to an extent which hardly joined the head to the neck. The police find a bloodied razor, that was used to slash the mothers throat and are stuck at a dead end when they see that the doors and windows of the flat were fastened from the inside.
It is at this juncture that Dupin begins his own investigation and the reader is taken through an engaging journey as Dupin derives from the facts of the case that the murders were in fact committed by an orang-otang and an advertisement about the lost animal in a newspaper is indeed responded to by the owner of the animal who upon assurance that he will not be charged with the murders, reveals that it was his orang-otang that had escaped with a razor on that fateful night, climbed up the lightning rod and entered the flat through one of the windows which had a screw loose, had in a fit of rage committed the acts of violence upon the two women and escaped by the same window. The owner of the animal, who was a sailor, had followed the animal and that is how he knew about the crime. But since he had been unable to climb up the lightning rod, he could not do anything. The deep masculine voice that the neighbors heard thus belonged to the sailor and the unidentifiable one to the orang-otang. The solving of the case by Dupin was not welcomed by the prefect of police who is sarcastic and ungrateful in acknowledging Dupins brilliance.
Both The Murders in the Rue Morgue and The Purloined Letter take place in a static setting with The Purloined Letter being all the more inanimate in its simplicity. However, the prefect of police, in The Purloined Letter, calls upon Dupins investigative capabilities himself and while The Murders in the Rue Morgue found Dupin refusing any compensation for his efforts, in The Purloined Letter, Dupin solves the case after he is offered a reward. The story of The Purloined Letter revolves around the theft of an important letter with sensitive content from the rooms of a lady. The police in The Purloined Letter, know who the thief is, but due to lack of evidence are unable to charge him. They search his apartments but to no avail. Dupin solves the case by delving into the mind of the thief and is successful in retrieving the letter. Dupin reveals that stolen objects are often to be located in plain sight which people searching for the object, would most certainly overlook. Dupin finds the letter in the thiefs rooms and replaces it with a fake one and shows once again that the fact that the police cannot go beyond the procedures set for them, is precisely the obstacle that stands in the way of their solving the case.
Poes play with human nature draws the attention of the readers by pointing to the fact that the thief and Dupin are two sides of the same coin, rather than opposite characters.
It is because of Dupins ability to get inside the mind of the thief, that enables him to understand the workings of his mind and thus figure out the location of the stolen letter. Poe does this by his analogy of the story of Atreus and Thyestes in the note that Dupin leaves for the thief in the fake letter which said - Un dessein si funeste, Sil nest digne dAtre, est digne de Thyeste. (When translated, it means - If such a sinister design isnt worthy of HYPERLINK httpen.wikipedia.orgwikiAtreus o Atreus Atreus, it is worthy of HYPERLINK httpen.wikipedia.orgwikiThyestes o Thyestes Thyestes). Both the thief and Dupin have an equal mind but Dupin succeeds in duping him because of his moral strength. Whereas the thief, or Minister D as he is named, is unscrupulous, Dupin is a man of principles and therefore it is he who triumphs in the end.
The Mystery of Marie Roget is a little distinct from both The Murders in the Rue Morgue and The Purloined Letter in that it takes place outdoors and is also based on actual events. The same method of deductive reasoning is once again applied in The Mystery of Marie Roget. Whereas the real events on which the story was based was never brought to any conclusion, Poe did solve the case in his story through the powers of ratiocination of Dupin.
While Poe builds his plots and writes his stories, he also enjoys tugging at the more subtle sensibilities of his readers. Thus, the audience is invited by Poe to participate in the process of solving the case through analysis and subsequent deductions and they are inspired to think beyond the immediate facts of the case. This form of writing was later on followed by many authors of the traditional school of detective fiction. It was a standard practice of Poe to contribute puzzles and complex problems to various publishing houses as well as newspapers and he challenged his readers to come up with solutions, though he often provided the solutions himself.
While Poes writings have been celebrated and his genius acknowledged, he has also been criticized from certain quarters. For instance, in The Murders in the Rue Morgue, the perpetrator of the crime being a beast rather than a human being has often been challenged on the grounds that Poe took his fascination for mysteries a little too far and thus provided his readers with an incredible solution rather than a credible one. The Mystery of Marie Roget has also been criticized as being little more than an essay which, in its sole focus on ratiocination, lost out on the complexity of a real story.
Poes contribution to the creation and formulation of the traditional school of detective fiction can hardly be denied. The most lasting impression hat Poe leaves in the minds of his readers is much more than merely the narration of a gripping story.
He leaves his readers with their own thoughts about the characters as well substance of the stories providing an amazing amount of insight into the workings of human nature. That Poe set and raised the standard of writing mystery stories is an established fact. As Poe himself wrote
Experience has shown, and a true philosophy will always show, that a vast, perhaps the larger portion of the truth arises from the seemingly irrelevant.
0 comments:
Post a Comment